Activity for peterh
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #295650 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #295651 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Why ssh ProxyJump and ProxyCommand options seem not working from a system account? Most importantly, `ProxyJump` in SSH is only a wrapper to `ProxyCommand`. Essentially, `ProxyJump` does a port-forwarding-only SSH session to the jump host and then executes the SSH session over this forwarded port. Its details are visible in the detailed log (`-v -v -v`). The cause of the ... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #295650 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Question | — |
Why ssh ProxyJump and ProxyCommand options seem not working from a system account? However, any time if I try to use from a system account, it fails. If I use it by su-ing into the system account, it works. There is nothing relevant in the log. More clearly, the log states this for an `ssh -v -v -v -J myjumphost mytarget` output: ``` debug1: OpenSSH10.0p2 Debian-7, OpenS... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #294167 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
How to make nmap to not resolve ports to service names? Nmap seem always showing service names (using an "nmap-services" file for that). I would like if nmap would show the port numbers. So: ``` 1.2.3.4.sunwebadmin 1.2.3.4.teradataordbms 1.2.3.4.tproxy 1.2.3.4.trivnet1 ``` For example, a similar tool, lsof, has the flag `-N` for that. Ca... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #293881 |
Yes I think that. But I happily change my view if there is such an input. I can also imagine a really unfortunate formulation from anyways goodwilling person. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #293881 |
Btw, since Ballmer's fall, Microsoft is not so insulting in its words, and it prefers embrace-extend-extinguish to the more direct confronation, but its goals are clearly the same. Behind the bars, the little Ballmers are still there, and they are very happy to compare us to viruses, thieves and ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #293767 |
"Application" is not a unix term. We use it for compatibility with the windows or user world. What Linux has, that are *processes*. Or, maybe, *process groups*. Application is a term which is used by the GUI for *processes* or *process groups* having some role in the managed resources (they open ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #293881 |
Note that github is owned by the Microsoft, and Microsofts company agenda - and also elemental business interest - to sell vendor locked, high-level tools to their users. That users, with a set of well-defined tools, directly operate in *their* filesystem hierarchy, that is not what they want. So... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |