Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Why isn't "porcelain" a popular term?

Post

Why isn't "porcelain" a popular term? [closed]

+1
−3

Closed as off topic by Quasímodo‭ on May 4, 2025 at 10:04

This question is not within the scope of Linux Systems.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

From What does the term "porcelain" mean in Git?:

"Porcelain" is the material from which toilets are usually made (and sometimes other fixtures such as washbasins). This is distinct from "plumbing" (the actual pipes and drains), where the porcelain provides a more user-friendly interface to the plumbing.

Git uses this terminology in analogy, to separate the low-level commands that users don't usually need to use directly (the "plumbing") from the more user-friendly high level commands (the "porcelain").

As "plumbing" is a well-known term in Unix, I wonder why "porcelain" isn't popularized as well?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Note that github is owned by the Microsoft, and Microsofts company agenda - and also elemental busine... (2 comments)
Note that github is owned by the Microsoft, and Microsofts company agenda - and also elemental busine...
peterh‭ wrote about 12 hours ago

Note that github is owned by the Microsoft, and Microsofts company agenda - and also elemental business interest - to sell vendor locked, high-level tools to their users. That users, with a set of well-defined tools, directly operate in their filesystem hierarchy, that is not what they want. So I find nothing surprising that they compare us to toilets. Because it is very obvious, "low-level commands that users don't usually need to use directly", that is about us.

peterh‭ wrote about 7 hours ago

Btw, since Ballmer's fall, Microsoft is not so insulting in its words, and it prefers embrace-extend-extinguish to the more direct confronation, but its goals are clearly the same. Behind the bars, the little Ballmers are still there, and they are very happy to compare us to viruses, thieves and now to toilets. I believe, this porcelain comparison is from one of them. Do not search for sense or logic, it has not - if we reduce the saying to what it wants to mean, that would be: "linux is s...". It is just formulated on a polite way.