Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How to run a command on a list of files?

+4
−0

Suppose I have a list of files on standard input. These may be the output of find, cat filelist.txt or something else.

How can I run a command on each file in turn?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

3 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+2
−0

In some cases, when you want to apply a pipeline or a complex command to each file, I find it useful to use while read:

find . -type d \
| while read d; do
	find $d -type f -maxdepth 1 \
	| head -n3;
done;

Hardened version:

find . -type d -print0 \
| while IFS= read -r -d '' d; do
	find "$d" -type f -maxdepth 1 -print0 \
	| head -z -n3;
done;

Portable filenames should only use characters from the portable filename character set https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap03.html#tag_03_282. But if you need to run your script in filesystems that may be compromised, or use non-portable file names for other reasons, use the hardened version.

Read the corresponding documentation of the features:

(The above shows the first 3 files in each directory.)

However, this forces an invocation of the command or pipeline for each path name. In general, xargs(1) is the simplest (and usually fastest) way:

find . -type f \
| xargs mv -t /tmp;

Hardened version:

find . -type f -print0 \
| xargs -0 mv -t /tmp;

(The above moves all files in . to /tmp.)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+5
−0

There are several options, like xargs and for. I'll leave those for other answers and only describe my favorite, GNU Parallel. You will have to install it separately, because unlike the inferior xargs it usually does not come pre-installed.

Parallel can take a list of files on STDIN and run a command on them.

# Count lines in each file under current directory using "wc FILENAME"
find | parallel wc {}

Actually, it can also take the list from other sources, like CLI arguments.

# Apply wc to only txt files in current dir (not subdirs)
parallel wc {} ::: *.txt

It supports various ways of manipulating the filename:

# Rename foo.JPG files to foo.jpg
find | grep '.JPG$' | parallel mv {} {.}.jpg

As you can see, you can do any kind of manipulation you want on the file list before you pipe it to Parallel.

Parallel also supports many other features like parallelization, grouping output with color, a dry run mode and so on. See man parallel for these.


Note that normally, these tools assume 1 file per line (delimited by \n). If you have exotic filenames, such as those with \n in the name, this won't work right. There are various workarounds for this, for example GNU find -print0, fd --print0 or parallel --null. You can find these in the man pages of the tools you use.

I personally prefer a workaround called "don't put newlines in filenames, and if you find any, delete them on sight, uninstall the program that made them, and yell at the developer in the issue tracker".

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Parallel sounds nice! (1 comment)
You may want to add a warning that parsing the output of `find` is strongly discouraged, because it w... (3 comments)
+4
−0
  • If I just used find to generate a list of files, then find's -exec argument is usually the way to run some other program on each file found.

    If you pipe the command to xargs, note that -P n will run up to n commands in parallel. The best value of n will depend on the relative usage of your CPU and your storage system.

  • If I have a program (say, generate_lists) that generates a list of files,

    for filename in $(generate_lists); do some_program "$filename" ; done
    

    is usually helpful. Make sure you quote your use of $filename -- more of them have spaces than you'd think.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

3 comment threads

xargs(1) is usually better than looping (1 comment)
for loops on command substitutions have quoting issues (1 comment)
Usually "number of cores" is a good starting value for `n`. (2 comments)

Sign up to answer this question »