Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Can I make a compressed RAM drive and externally prepare a (pre-)compressed file to copy onto it?

Post

Can I make a compressed RAM drive and externally prepare a (pre-)compressed file to copy onto it?

+3
−0

I don't know what these things are called exactly in the Linux world.

But there is the concept of a drive in RAM, to write files onto and read them like it was any disk drive. There is also the concept of an intrinsically compressed drive.

(Effective) compression takes time, of course. So I also wonder if there is such a thing to pre-compress a file externally to the system that has the compressed drive, and move it, e.g. coming from a network connection, onto the RAM drive without it taking time to compress. (Though I guess that compressed drives favor speed over level of compression, to be feasible at all?)

For the curious (and maybe because someone might tell me that I should ask a different question as this scenario drawn here is not a good way to do what I want):

The aim of this is: I have a machine with very limited storage (eMMC), and it is supposed to write a trimmed-down Linux image onto another machine it is connected to, and there is already a readily available program, geared towards doing that to the even smaller target machine. That program takes a typical image file.

I cannot hold the image on the storage of the "pushing" machine. But what if I made a RAM drive and kept a compressed Linux image in it, loaded from external connection for this event, and pointed the mentioned available flashing program to that file. The Linux image would not fit, uncompressed, in the RAM - but compressed, it probably will, at least with usual zip settings, which are, I guess, better than a drive for "live" stuff.

I could write a modified flasher program and do decompression myself. But if the same thing actually was only a few standard Linux commands away from working, why do it myself. (And also, learning new things that Linux can do, if it can do them, is always good.)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

An alternative approach (2 comments)
ramfs (1 comment)
An alternative approach
Canina‭ wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

As an alternative approach, if the system running the flasher program has network access, you can mount a file system over the network and just access the data that way, removing altogether the need to store the file on the flasher system. (Though consider how the flashing process will deal with, for example, latency.) This might typically be done using sshfs, but there are other alternatives as well, such as Samba (SMB/CIFS), nfs and s3fs.

CanisSomnolentus‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Thanks, I'll check those things out! I was thinking about something like that, too, but then it seemed like having it all available without any hiccups coupd be better. But if the flasher is forgiving, may not be an issue.