Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+1 −1
Q&A Is there a danger in using the current FreeBSD version?

I read about the Wikipedia article about the backdoor in XZ. It was only in the developer version and not in production. Now Netflix is "current" (develop) version of FreeBSD. Doesn't that put Ne...

1 answer  ·  posted 7mo ago by programAngel‭  ·  edited 7mo ago by programAngel‭

Question release-cycle freebsd xz vulnerabilities
#4: Post edited by user avatar programAngel‭ · 2026-02-26T18:25:44Z (7 months ago)
  • I read about [the Wikipedia article about the backdoor in XZ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor). It was only in the developer version and not in production.
  • Now Netflix is current version of FreeBSD.
  • Doesn't that put Netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?
  • I mean when there is a new security hole that in a preview build that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after all, most Linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the development version.
  • I read about [the Wikipedia article about the backdoor in XZ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor). It was only in the developer version and not in production.
  • Now Netflix is "current" (develop) version of FreeBSD.
  • Doesn't that put Netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?
  • I mean when there is a new security hole that in a preview build that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after all, most Linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the development version.
#3: Post edited by user avatar programAngel‭ · 2026-02-26T18:19:54Z (7 months ago)
  • I read about [the Wikipedia article about the backdoor in XZ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor). It was only in the developer version and not in production.
  • Now Netflix is current version of FreeBSD.
  • Doesn't that put Netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?
  • I mean when there is a new security hole that in a preview build that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after, most Linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the development version.
  • I read about [the Wikipedia article about the backdoor in XZ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor). It was only in the developer version and not in production.
  • Now Netflix is current version of FreeBSD.
  • Doesn't that put Netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?
  • I mean when there is a new security hole that in a preview build that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after all, most Linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the development version.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Michael‭ · 2026-02-26T18:17:42Z (7 months ago)
Improve grammar. Re-tag. Use natural linking.
  • is there a danger of using current freebsd version
  • Is there a danger in using the current FreeBSD version?
  • I read about the xz backdoor.
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor
  • It was only in the developer version and not in production.
  • Now netflix is current version of freebsd.
  • isn't that put netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?
  • I mean when there is a new security hole that in current that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after, most linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the developing version
  • I read about [the Wikipedia article about the backdoor in XZ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor). It was only in the developer version and not in production.
  • Now Netflix is current version of FreeBSD.
  • Doesn't that put Netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?
  • I mean when there is a new security hole that in a preview build that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after, most Linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the development version.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar programAngel‭ · 2026-02-26T09:57:03Z (7 months ago)
is there a danger of using current freebsd version
I read about the xz backdoor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor

It was only in the developer version and not in production.

Now netflix is current version of freebsd. 
isn't that put netflix in danger to suffer from the same security problem?

I mean when there is a new security hole that in current that has not yet been discovered like in the case of xz. after, most linux installations were protected from it because it was not in the "production"/stable version, only in the developing version