Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A Does Fedora have cutting edge features, and what makes it so?

I saw another post recommend using Fedora if you want cutting edge features. Is Fedora really a "cutting edge" distro? I am not very familiar with Fedora, I know it's a community counterpart to R...

1 answer  ·  posted 7mo ago by matthewsnyder‭  ·  last activity 6mo ago by Michael‭

#2: Post edited by user avatar matthewsnyder‭ · 2024-04-26T16:52:43Z (7 months ago)
  • I saw [another post](https://linux.codidact.com/posts/282891/291351#answer-291351) recommend using Fedora if you want cutting edge features.
  • Is Fedora really a "cutting edge" distro?
  • I am not very familiar with Fedora, I know it's a community counterpart to RHEL and sometimes less tested new stuff goes into Fedora before going into RHEL, since they don't have to provide as much support for breakage in Fedora. Otherwise, given their packaging approach, I don't see why it would be any more "cutting edge" than say Debian Unstable or the "testing" releases of other distros.
  • For a distro like Arch, it is clear why you would expect cutting edge-ness:
  • * Packagers do minimal testing and adaptations of newly released software, so they can release new package versions very quickly
  • * There is also AUR which has an even more minimal process so new versions can come out even faster
  • * Rolling release means they don't get slowed down by backwards compatibility
  • * Arch's philosophy and culture strongly favors using the latest version of everything
  • Is there any special thing like this about Fedora that ensures cutting edge features? Or is it just cutting edge relative to RHEL? For example, is there something like "a lot of new Linux features are developed at Red Hat first so they appear in Fedora before other distros adopt them"?
  • Fedora already has extensive documentation and active forums, and I'm sure the "long answer" is in there somewhere. I am looking for a shorter answer, no more than 3-5 paragraphs.
  • I saw [another post](https://linux.codidact.com/posts/282891/291351#answer-291351) recommend using Fedora if you want cutting edge features.
  • Is Fedora really a "cutting edge" distro?
  • I am not very familiar with Fedora, I know it's a community counterpart to RHEL and sometimes less tested new stuff goes into Fedora before going into RHEL, since they don't have to provide as much support for breakage in Fedora. Otherwise, given their packaging approach, I don't see why it would be any more "cutting edge" than say Debian Unstable or the "testing" releases of other distros.
  • For a distro like Arch, it is clear why you would expect cutting edge-ness:
  • * Packagers do minimal testing and adaptations of newly released software, so they can release new package versions very quickly
  • * There is also AUR which has an even more minimal process so new versions can come out even faster
  • * Rolling release means they don't get slowed down by backwards compatibility
  • * Arch's philosophy and culture strongly favors using the latest version of everything
  • Is there any special thing like this about Fedora that ensures cutting edge features? Or is it just cutting edge relative to RHEL? For example, is there something like "a lot of new Linux features are developed at Red Hat first so they appear in Fedora before other distros adopt them"? Or perhaps it is a matter of culture, where somehow Fedora maintainers/users have much more appetite for new stuff than other distros?
  • Fedora already has extensive documentation and active forums, and I'm sure the "long answer" is in there somewhere. I am looking for a shorter answer, no more than 3-5 paragraphs.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar matthewsnyder‭ · 2024-04-26T16:51:01Z (7 months ago)
Does Fedora have cutting edge features, and what makes it so?
I saw [another post](https://linux.codidact.com/posts/282891/291351#answer-291351) recommend using Fedora if you want cutting edge features.

Is Fedora really a "cutting edge" distro?

I am not very familiar with Fedora, I know it's a community counterpart to RHEL and sometimes less tested new stuff goes into Fedora before going into RHEL, since they don't have to provide as much support for breakage in Fedora. Otherwise, given their packaging approach, I don't see why it would be any more "cutting edge" than say Debian Unstable or the  "testing" releases of other distros.

For a distro like Arch, it is clear why you would expect cutting edge-ness:

* Packagers do minimal testing and adaptations of newly released software, so they can release new package versions very quickly
* There is also AUR which has an even more minimal process so new versions can come out even faster
* Rolling release means they don't get slowed down by backwards compatibility
* Arch's philosophy and culture strongly favors using the latest version of everything

Is there any special thing like this about Fedora that ensures cutting edge features? Or is it just cutting edge relative to RHEL? For example, is there something like "a lot of new Linux features are developed at Red Hat first so they appear in Fedora before other distros adopt them"?

Fedora already has extensive documentation and active forums, and I'm sure the "long answer" is in there somewhere. I am looking for a shorter answer, no more than 3-5 paragraphs.