Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Group and users seem to disagree about whether the users are in the group

On my current setup (running Linux Mint 20.3 Cinnamon), I have an administrative user and several ordinary users. I intend for all of these users to be in the same group, which happens to have the ...

0 answers  ·  posted 8mo ago by Karl Knechtel‭

#1: Initial revision by user avatar Karl Knechtel‭ · 2024-03-24T22:04:12Z (8 months ago)
Group and users seem to disagree about whether the users are in the group
On my current setup (running Linux Mint 20.3 Cinnamon), I have an administrative user and several ordinary users. I intend for all of these users to be in the same group, which happens to have the same name as the admin user name. (After doing the basic guided setup and looking up some tutorials, I used `adduser` to create the standard users and set them to be in the admin user's group.)

Thus, my `/etc/passwd` contains entries like (anonymized):

```
adminuser:x:1000:1000:,,,:/home/adminuser:/bin/bash
basicuser:x:1001:1000:Boring Username,,,:/home/basicuser:/bin/bash
plainuser:x:1002:1000:Cliche Username,,,:/home/plainuser:/bin/bash
```

To my understanding, this should mean that all the users have primary group 1000 (named `adminuser`) - and therefore, the group with that id should be known to contain all these users.

Acting as the admin user, I try querying what groups `basicuser` is in:

```
$ id basicuser 
uid=1001(basicuser) gid=1000(adminuser) groups=1000(adminuser)

$ groups basicuser 
basicuser : adminuser
```

This is as I expect. However, if I now try using `getent` to query *the group* to see *which users* are in it, I only see the admin user:

```
$ getent group 1000
adminuser:x:1000:adminuser
```

Why doesn't it report `adminuser:x:1000:adminuser,basicuser,plainuser`? Is there a different way I should query for this, or something I have overlooked to make the group membership properly recognized?