Comments on What's the "big picture" of how my operating system is put together?
Post
What's the "big picture" of how my operating system is put together?
My understanding is that one of the key advantages of Linux is modularity: the actual Linux kernel is quite small, and then what we call Linux is that plus the "rest of the system" - hence "operating system" (or "Linux Systems"). And then the latter is typically, but not necessarily GNU (or should I say "the GNU system", to distinguish it from the organization?), and it's built up of a lot of smaller pieces.
Now, my package manager tells me that I have over 2500 installed packages, but it seems like the system isn't really as complicated as that implies. I know that a single application could account for many packages in some cases (e.g. over 100 of them on my system seem to have something to do with Python). And I've heard nebulous terms like "desktop environment" and "window manager" that seem like they describe conceptually distinct, separable components of this "Linux system".
Is it really like that? Without getting into details about the dependencies between packages, does it make sense to think of them as logically grouped into a few components?
If so, what might those components be? And how modular are they really - can a distro maintainer basically choose an option for each and call it a day; or does everything have to be stitched together at the level of individual software packages and then carefully reconfigured to cooperate properly; or just what?
1 comment thread