Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How to create systemd unit that depends on a website being up?

Post

How to create systemd unit that depends on a website being up?

+1
−0

I'm going to write some systemd services. All of these can only be run if a certain website is up. I thought I could create a ~/.config/systemd/user/website.service this:

[Unit]
Description=Confirm that example is up
Wants=network-online.target
After=network-online.target nss-lookup.target

[Service]
ExecStart=curl --head example.com

And then I can make my actual units have Requires=website.service.

When I run systemctl --user start website, it just exits. When I check systemctl --user status website I see the header in the logs. But the status just says "inactive", not success or fail (based on exit code of fail).

When I tell systemd to run my other units, it should first run website.service, and only if it succeeds should the target units run. Otherwise they should fail. How do I accomplish this?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

this sounds related to the type of systemd service/unit. Check the man pages for `systemd.service` or... (1 comment)
And furthermore, systemd should be destroyed. :) (1 comment)
And furthermore, systemd should be destroyed. :)
matthewsnyder‭ wrote over 1 year ago

And furthermore, systemd should be destroyed. :)