Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read

JohnDoea‭

That JohnDoe with the extra a.

Language

I suggest to the community to start making the site more friendly to non native speakers of English in general.

Elitism

Anyone who came here to be an elitist and for example has much knowledge in mathematics but feels great downvoting questions about the foundations of mathematics such as my question about binary power operations is in my opinion damaging this community at least in the long run.

Question downvote abuse exists !

Often asking the right question is much harder than giving the right answer.

From my experience with humanity in general and Q&A websites in particular, the assumption that people downvote questions only for legitimate quality assurance purposes is naive at best and people might also do that because:

  1. The natural animalistic human tendency for arrogance/supremacy/elitism which only a true hero can conquer
  2. The desire to shame a certain user which is grasped as "noncontributing" or worse "discontributing"
  3. The desire to cause frustration to a user who knows with high certainty that the specific downvoter did so
  4. The desire to display hostility towards a user who knows with high certainty that the specific downvoter did so
  5. The desire to block a user from making any further actions, even if these are good (regularly or even exceptionally)

Preventing this destructive phenomenon

If we use votes (in general), let's ensure we significantly restrict their usage by, say, allowing people to vote questions only if they have published at least three questions in the respective network website and/or to necessate explaining votes in discussion thread/s, always moderated to keep feedback focused on one main issue in each thread, constructive and without escalation.

A possibly better idea altogether is to totally take down any "numerical reputation" system out because people ask questions in fields of knowledge they want to become more knowledgeable on and answer answers in fields of knowledge they want to formally be grasped as smart on and there are much better ways to assure quality, giving feedback and building reputation.


https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/118709/was-there-an-attempt-to-create-a-programming-language-aimed-for-maximal-abstract

See all »
  Reputation -8
Number of top-level posts 3
Number of answers 0
Sum of received votes (up minus down) -6
Number of edits made 7

Earned Abilities

Statistics

Posts
Count 3
Questions 3
Answers 0
Articles 0

Votes cast
Count 0

Flags raised
Count 0